THE ‘ECOSYSTEM SERVICES’ CONCEPT IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to introduce the ‘ecosystem services’ concept from the legal perspective, which so far has not attracted as much attention in the Polish scientific community as analyses focused on natural and economic aspects. The concept is strongly promoted as a part of biodiversity and water protection measures which are issues of key importance for the agriculture. This means the agriculture sector will be the first to be affected by legal loopholes in this area. The analysis includes a general attempt to identify the legal grounds for the term and concept of ‘ecosystem services’ as well as the assessment of the current state of the Polish legislator’s works on this matter. At the same time, a confrontation of this concept’s theoretical grounds with the underpinning values of environmental law (especially with the ‘polluter pays’ principle) allows to detail the part of this concept (positive externalities of ecosystem services and PES) which currently poses a real challenge for the Polish legislator and requires a redefinition of current directions for specifying the environmental rights and obligations.
Keywords
sustainable development of agriculture; ecosystem services; environmental law; ‘polluter pays’ principle; ‘beneficiary pays’ principle
References
Blanco, E., Razzaque, J. (2009). Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being in a Globalized World: Assessing the Role of Law. Human Rights Quarterly, Issue 3, 692-720.
Brand, U., Vadrot, A.B.M. (2013). Epistemic Selectivities and the Valorisation of Nature: the Cases of the Nagoya Protocol And the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform For Biodiversity And Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Law, Environment and Dev. J., Issue 2, 202-220.
CICES (2017). Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: https://cices.eu
FAO (2010). Relevance of OECD agri-environmental measures for remuneration of positive externalities/payments for environmental services. Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/al921e/al921e00.pdf
Froger, G., Boisvert, V., Méral, P., Le Coq, J-F., Caron, A., Aznar, O. (2015). Market-Based Instruments for Ecosystem Services between Discourse and Reality: An Economic and Narrative Analysis. Sustainability, 7, 11595-11611.
Global Environment Facility (2014). GEF Investments on Payment for Ecosystem Services Schemes, World Bank: Washington, DC. Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20681; License: CC BY 3.0 IGO
IPBES (2012). Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: http://www.ipbes.net/about-us
Król, M.A. (2014). Ochrona biosfery w działalności rolniczej. In: M. Górski (ed.), Prawo ochrony środowiska (p. 629-642). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Business.
Lugo, E. (2008). Ecosystem Services, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, and the Conceptual Difference Between Benefits Provided by Ecosystems and Benefits Provided by People. Journal of Land Use and Environ. L., Issue 2, 243-261.
MAES (2017). Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: http://biodiversity.europa.eu/maes
Maes, J. (2016). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES): Highlights and Uncertainties of a Science-Policy Interface on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Ekonomia i środowisko, Nr 4, 52-64.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005a). Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/History.html
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005b). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Minister Środowiska (2014). Piąty krajowy raport z wdrażania konwencji o różnorodności biologicznej. Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: http://biodiv.gdos.gov.pl/wdrazanie-konwencji/national-reports/piaty-krajowy-raport/v-krajowy-raport-cbd.pdf
Monteduro, M. (2013). Environmental Law and Agroecology. Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Ecosystem Services as a New Challenge for Environmental Legal Doctrine. Europ. Energy and Environ. Law Rev., Issue 1, 2-11.
OECD (1992). The Polluter-Pays Principle. OECD Analyses and Recommendations - OCDE/GD(92)81, Paris: OECD.
Olszynski, M.Z.P. (2012). Environmental Damages after the Federal Environmental Enforcement Act: Bringing Ecosystem Services to Canadian Environmental Law?, Osgoode Hall Law J., Issue 1, 129-176.
Radecki, W. (2008). Ustawa o ochronie przyrody. Komentarz. Warszawa: Difin.
Ring, I., Hansjürgens, B., Elmqvist, T., Wittmer, H., Sukhdev, P. (2010). Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative. Current Opinion in Environ. Sustainability, Issue 2, 15-26.
Ruhl, J. B., Lant, C. L., Kraft, S.E. (2007). The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services. Washington: Island Press.
Ruhl, J.B. (2008). Agriculture And Ecosystem Services: Strategies For State And Local Governments. N.Y. U. Environmental Law Journal, vol. 17, 424-459.
Salzman, J. (2006). A Field of Green? The Past and Future of Ecosystem Services. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, Issue 2, 133-151.
Salzman, J., Thompson, B.H., Daily, G.C. (2001). Protecting Ecosystem Services: Science, Economics, and Law, Stanford Environ. Law J., Issue 2, 309-332.
Stenseke, M. (2016). The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and the challenge of integrating social sciences and humanities. Bull. of Geography. Socio-econ. Series, Vol. 33, 119-129.
Stępniewska, M., et al. (2017) Capability of the Polish legal system to introduce the ecosystem services approach into environmental management. Ecosystem Services http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.025
TEEB (2014). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) FOr agriculture & food. Concept note. Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: http://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/TEEB-for-Agriculture-and-Food_Concept-note1.pdf
TEEB (2017). Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: http://www.teebweb.org/about/the-initiative
UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2013). Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): best practice guide. Downloaded on 20.06.2017 from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/payments-for-ecosystem-services-pes-best-practice-guide
UNECE (2014). The Value Of Forests. Payments for Ecosystem Services in a Green Economy. Geneva Timber And Forest Study Paper 34 (ECE/TIM/SP/34), Geneva: United Nations.
Vincent, J.R. (2012). Ecosystem Services and Green Growth. Policy Research Working Paper 6233, Washington: The World Bank Development Research Group Environment and Energy Team & Sustainable Development Network Office of the Chief Economist.
Żmija, D. (2011). System płatności bezpośrednich w Polsce w kontekście rozwiązań stosowanych w Unii Europejskiej. Zesz. Nauk. SGGW w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Nr 1, 193-201.
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland Poland
This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.
