CHARACTERISATION OF SMALLHOLDER RESETTLED SUGARCANE FARMERS AND THEIR PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS MICROFINANCE IN ZIMBABWE (CHIREDZI)
Abstract
The study sought to characterize smallholder A2 resettled sugarcane farmers and evaluate their perceptions towards microfinance. Data was collected using a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used. Results revealed that the majority of farmers solely depend on sugarcane farming. More than 80% of farmers (non-participants) were risk averse while, 90% of the beneficiaries indicated to be risk neutral. More than 90% of the sample farmers subscribe to Sugarcane Farmers Associations. Farmers perceived interest rates, processing and administration charges to be very high. Male farmers dominated their female counterpart and primary education being the highest education level attained by the majority of farmers. Farmers perceived the Estate to be offering better support than the government, MFIs and Farmers Associations in their areas of advocacy. Policy suggestions include gender balance on land allocation; government to be proactive after allocating land. Further recommendations include that MFIs should supplement the disbursed funds with other non-financial services; reduce interest rates, payback period, application procedures and time and increasing grace period.
Keywords
smallholder resettled farmers; microfinance; farmer perceptions
References
Chauke, P.K., Motlhatlhana, M.L., Pfumayaramba, T.K., Anim, F.D.K. (2013). Factors influencing access to credit: A case study of smallholder farmers in the Capricorn district of South Africa. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 8(7), 582–585.
Chikodzi, D., Murwendo, T., Malvern, F.S. (2013). Climate Change and Variability in Southeast Zimbabwe: Scenarios and Societal Opportunities. Am. J. Clim. Change, 2, 36–46
Christen, R.P., Lyman, T.R., Roesenburg, R. (2003). Microfinance consensus guidelines: Guiding principles on regulation and supervision of microfinance. Consultative group to Assist the Poor, World Bank.
Conning, J., Udry, C. (2005). Rural Financial Markets in Developing Countries, Economic Growth Centre. Yale University and Centre Discussion Paper No. 914.
Dube, L., Mariga, T., Mrema, M. (2015). Determinants of Access to Formal Credit by Smallholder Tobacco Farmers in Makoni District, Zimbabwe. Green. J. Agric. Sci., 5 (1).
Ferede, K.H. (2012). Determinants of Rural Households Demand for and Access to Credit in Microfinance Institutions: The Case of Atamata Woreda – Ethiopia. Master’s Dissertation, Wageningen University Research Center.
Harris, D.S. (2007). The State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2007. Washington, DC: The Microcredit Summit Campaign. Retrieved May 12th 2008 from: http://www.microcreditsummit.org/pubs/reports/socr/EngSOCR2007
Jetti, A.P. (2011). Microfinance, Gender and the Commons: Current Challenges and Future Possibilities. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/plat1.htm.
Kang’ethe, S.K., Serima, J. (2014). Exploring challenges and opportunities embedded in Small-scale Farming in Zimbabwe. J. Hum. Ecol., 46(2), 177–185.
Kiriti-Nganga, T.W. (2005). Micro-Finance and Poverty Alleviation: How Effective is it in Alleviating Gender Based
Poverty? In: C. Tisdell (Ed.), Poverty, Poverty Alleviation and Social Disadvantage: Analysis, Case Studies and Policies. Serials Publications: New Delhi.
Lawal, J.O., Omonona, B.T., Ajani, O.I.Y., Oni, O.A. (2009). Effects of social capital on credit access among coca farming households in Osun State, Nigeria. Agric. J., 4(4), 184–191. Retrieved March 7th 2014 from: http://docsdrive.com /pdfs/medwelljournals /aj/2009/184-191.pdf
Lawin, K.G., Tamini, L.D., Bocoum, I. (2018). The impact of Microcredit on farms and rural household: A literature review of experimental studies CIRANO Working Paper. 2018S-07. Scientific Series.
Long, I. (2009). Perceptions of Microfinance in Cameroon: A Case Study of UNICS, Yaoundé (2009). Independent
Study Project (ISP) Collection. Paper 729.
Luvhengo, U., Lekunze, J.N. (2017). Identifying factors that influence small-scale farmers’ access to credit from commercial banks in Greater Taung Municipality, North West Province, South Africa. J. Agribus. Rural Dev., 3(45), 601–611.
Mago, S., Hofisi, C. (2016). Microfinance as a pathway for smallholder farming in Zimbabwe. J. Environ. Econ. 7(3), 60–66. doi:10.21511/ee.07(3).2016.07.
Microfinance Gateway Highlights 2008 (2009). Retrieved from:
https://www.findevgateway.org/paper/2009/01/microfinance-gateway-highlights-2008
Munyoro, G., Chirimba, F.T. (2017). The contribution of microfinance to the development of rural farming in Zimbabwe: The case of Domboshava rural farmers. International J. Res. Bus. Manag., 5(11), 153–166.
Sajan, D. (2021). A Study on the awareness of benefits, perceptions of borrowers to problems in finance, and utilisation of Microfinance. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Manag., 8(1), 312–319. DOI: 10.3126/ijssm.v8i1.32960
Siddiqui, K., Gilal, F.G. (2012). Perceptions towards Microfinance in Pakistan. Asian J. Bus. Manag. Sci., 1(10), 6–10.
Ugiagbe, E.O. (2014). A survey of the perception of the services of Micro Finance Institutions by the female service users in Benin city, South-South, Nigeria. Int. J. Fin. Bank. Stud. – IJFBS, 3(2), 28–47.
Wadud, M.A. (2013). Impact of Microcredit on Agricultur al Farm Performance and Food Security in Bangladesh.
Dhaka: Institute of Microfinance. Working Paper 14/13.
World Bank (2006). The role of postal networks in expanding access to financial services—Volume I. Discussion Paper. Global Information and Communication Technologies Group, the World Bank
University of Fort Hare South Africa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-323X
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.
