This study assessed the competitiveness of rice productionunder different varietal technologies in Osun State.A multistage sampling technique was adopted to select the respondentsfor the study. Both primary and secondary data, includingprices of inputs and outputs, rice yields, import tariff,transportation cost, port loading and unloading charges andofficial exchange rate, foreign exchange premium, etc., werecollected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thePolicy Analysis Matrix (PAM) approach. The results revealedthat effective protection coefficients (EPC) for the three identifiedrice varieties (Local, FARO53 and FARO54) were 0.89,0.98 and 0.97, respectively. The Domestic Resource Cost(DRC) was 0.84, 0.48 and 0.48; the Nominal Protection Coefficient(NPC) on tradable inputs and outputs was 0.89, 0.98and 0.97; while the Social Cost Benefit (SCB) was 0.85, 0.52and 0.52 for the three varietal technologies, respectively. Theresults indicate that rice farmers using the three varieties havea comparative advantage (DRC < 1) in rice production in thestudy area, and the two improved varieties provided a greatercompetitiveness. The study concluded that Osun State hasa comparative advantage in rice production under the importparity prices regime which, however, is not true under the assumptionsof export parity.

Akande, T. (2002). An Overview of the Nigeria Rice Economy.Monograph Series. Nigerian Institute of Social and
Economic Research (NISER) Ibadan.

Babatunde, R. O., Salami, M. F., Muhammed, B. A. (2017). Determinants of yield gap in rainfed and irrigated rice production systems – evidence from household survey in Kwara State, Nigeria. J. Agribus. Rural Dev., 1(43), 25–33. http://dx.doi. org/10.17306/J.JARD.2017.00286

FOS [Federal Office of Statistics] (2000). Annual Abstract of Statistics, Lagos, P.2.

IRRI [International Rice Research Institute] (2001). Rice Statistics. Retrieved Feb 15th 2014 from:

Monke, E., Pearson, S. (1989). The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, and London.

Ogbe, A. O., Okoruwa, V. O., Saka, O. J. (2011). Competitiveness of Nigerian Rice and Maize Production Ecologies: A Policy Analysis Approach. Tropic. Subtropic. Agro Ecos., 14, 493–500.

Osun State Agricultural Development Programme (OSSADEP) (1993). Report of Survey on Rice. Agricultural Extension Department. Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria: OSSADEP.

Shobowale, O. J. (2000). Towards Developing A Coordinated Rice Seed Production. National Seed Service. (Mimeographed, Ibadan). Appl. Tropic. Agric., 2(2), 152–159.

Tsegai, D. W., Kormawa, P. M. (2009). The determinants of urban households demand for cassava and cassava products in Kaduna, Northern Nigeria: An application of the AIDS model. Eur. J. Dev. Res., 2, 435–447.

Ugochukwu, A. I., Ezedinma, C. I. (2011). Intensification of Rice Production Systems in Southeastern Nigeria: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach. IJAMAD, 1(2), 89–100.

UNEP (2005). Integrated Assessment of the Impact of Trade Liberation. A Country Study on the Nigerian Rice Sector.

USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (2015). Grain and Feed annual. GAIN REPORT. Accessed 30 June 2016, available from: Publications/Grain%20and%20Feed%20Annual_Lagos_Nigeria_4-4-2014.pdf

WARDA (2003). Strategy for rice sector revitalization in Nigeria. Project Report -The Nigerian Rice Economy in a Competitive World: Constraints, Opportunities And Strategic Choices. Abidjan: WARDA – The Africa Rice Centre. Retrieved from:

Published : 2018-12-31

Kassali, R., & Jimoh, L. (2018). COMPETITIVENESS IN RICE PRODUCTION IN OSUN STATE, NIGERIA: THE POLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX APPROACH. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 48(2), 129-136.

Rabirou Kassali 
Lateef Olatunbosun Jimoh 

CitedBy Crossref

CitedBy Scopus

HTML tutorial

This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.