CODE OF ETHICS

The editors of this journal enforce a rigorous peer-review process with strict ethical policies and standards to ensure to include high quality scientific works to the field of scholarly publication. Plagiarism, data fabrication, and image manipulation are not tolerated.

Ethical policy of Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) recommendations.  COPE aims to define best practice in the ethics of scholarly publishing and to assist editors, editorial board members, owners of journals and publishers to achieve this goal.

The following presents only a few guidelines to the ethical policy of Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development. Please see the original documents to obtain more detailed requirements (http://publicationethics.org/).

Duties of Editors:
Editors are responsible for everything published in their journals. They strive to meet the needs of readers and authors, ensure the high quality of the published material, protect the confidentiality of all information and be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, reactions and apologies when the need arises.

Duties of Authors:
Authors must confirm that all the work in the submitted manuscript is original and acknowledge and cite content reproduced from other sources.

They should obtain permission to reproduce any content from other sources and declare any potential conflict of interest.

All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.

The authorship of the paper should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of presented work. The editors of Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development quarterly lead the policy of ghostwriting and guest authorship prevention.

The authors describe their individual contributions to the papers as follows: "Conceptualization, X.X. and Y.Y.; Methodology, X.X.; Validation, X.X., Y.Y..; Formal Analysis, X.X.; Investigation, X.X.; Resources, X.X.; Data Curation, X.X.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, X.X.; Writing – Review & Editing, X.X.; Visualization, X.X.; Supervision, X.X.

X.X. and Y.Y. refers to the Authors’ names.

See -> https://publicationethics.org/files/2003pdf12_0.pdf

Duties of Reviewers:
Reviewers need to be objective and constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript, keep all manuscript and review details confidential and to alert the editor to any published or submitted content that is substantially similar to that under review.

See  https://publicationethics.org/files/Ethical_Guidelines_For_Peer_Reviewers_2.pdf