HOUSEHOLD LEVEL SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE CHANGES IN CULTIVATED AREAS: THE CASE OF RAYMOND MHLABA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, SOUTH AFRICA
Abstract
Understanding the detailed web of factors influencing changes in cultivated areas at the household level is critical for sustainable development in the dynamics of agricultural systems. Households, as basic units within the agricultural framework, are at the center of decision-making processes that have a direct impact on land use patterns. Hence this study estimated the socio-economic and institutional factors that are associated with changes in the area of land under cultivation and associated perceptions. The study was carried out in the Raymond Mhlaba Local Municipality, where land cultivation has drastically dropped. A total of 400 respondents were chosen randomly. Estimates of the socio-economic and institutional variables that affect changes in the area under cultivation were made using the Multinomial Logit Regression model. Descriptive results revealed that most respondents reported a decrease in the area of land they had under cultivation and few reported an increase or no change. The results further revealed mixed perceptions regarding any potential increase in the amount of land cultivated. Both negative and positive perceptions were noted. The empirical results indicate that livestock ownership and marital status are associated with a decrease in the amount of land cultivated, while the number of family members and access to extension services are related to an increase in amount of land cultivated. Institutional factors could be leveraged to promote an increase in rural cultivated land.
Keywords
rural areas; cultivated land; land use change; biodiversity; Raymond Mhlaba
References
Bisht, I.S., Rana, J.C., Ahlawat, S.P. (2020). The future of smallholder farming in India: Some sustainability considerations. Sustaina-bility, 12(9), 3751. https://doi.org/10.3390/
su12093751
Bosselmann, A.S. (2012). Mediating factors of land use change among coffee farmers in a biological corridor. Ecol. Econ., 80, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.007
Bragagnolo, C., Correia, R., Malhado, A.C.M., de Marins, M., Ladle, R.J. (2017). Understanding non-compliance: Local people’s per-ceptions of natural resource exploitation inside two National Parks in Northeast Brazil. J. Nature Conserv., 40(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNC.2017.09.006
Briassoulis, H. (2020). Analysis of land use change: Theoretical and modeling approaches. United State of America: WVU Research. Retrieved from: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=rri-web-book.
Campbell, B.M., Beare, D.J., Bennett, E.M., Hall-Spencer, J.M., Ingram, J.S.I., Shindell, D. (2017). Agriculture production as a major driver of the earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc., 22(4), 1–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26798991
Danso-Abbeam, G., Ehiakpor, D.S., Aidoo, R. (2018). Agricultural extension and its effects on farm productivity and income: Insight from Northern Ghana. Agric. Food Sec., 7, 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0225-x
ECSECC (2017). Amahlathi Local Municipality Socio Economic Review and Outlook. East London. Retrieved from: https://www.ecsecc.org/documentrepository/informationcentre/amathole-district-municipality_74397.pdf
Foguesatto, C.R., Mores, G.V., Dalmutt, K.S., Costa, C. (2020). Will I have a potential successor? Factors influencing family farming succession in Brazil. Land Use Pol., 97, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104643
Geist, H., Lambin, E. (2002). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience, 52(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052
[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2
Haines-Young, R. (2009). Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Pol., 26(9), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.009
Hamad, M.A., Adam, M.A., Door, S.E.F. (2019). Assessment the role of village extension worker in North Kordofan Rural Develop-ment Project (NKRDP), Sudan. MOJ Ecol. Env. Sci., 4(4), 169–180. 10.15406/mojes.2019.04.00150
Hassan, Z., Shabbir, R., Ahmad, S.S., Malik, A.H., Aziz, N., Erum, S. (2016). Dynamics of land use and land cover change (LULCC) using geospatial techniques: a case study of Islamabad Pakistan. Springer Plus, 5(812), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2414-z
Javed, S.A., Haider, A., Nawaz, M. (2020). How agricultural practices managing market risk get attributed to climate change? Qua-si-experiment evidence. J. Rural Stud., 73, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.020
Kassie, M., Jaleta, M., Shiferaw, B., Mmbando, F., Mekuria, M. (2013). Adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices in smallholder systems: Evidence from rural Tanzania. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 80(3), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.007
Keenan, R.J., Reams, G.A., Achard, F., de Freitas, J.V., Grainger, A., Lindquist, E. (2015). Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Forest Ecol. Manag., 352, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.014
Le Roux, J., Smith, H. (2014). Soil erosion in South Africa – its natural distribution. Grain SA, Retrieved from: https://www.grainsa.co.za/soil-erosion-in-south-africa---its-nature-and-distribution.
Masten, A.S. (2018). Resilience theory and research on children and families: Past, present, and promise. J. Family Theory Rev., 10(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12255
Ngeywo, J., Basweti, E., Shitandi, A. (2015). Influence of gender, age, marital status and farm size on coffee production: A case of Kisii County, Kenya. Asian J. Agric. Exten. Econ. Soc., 5(3), 117–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2015/15702
Oluwatayo, I.B. (2019). Towards assuring food security in South Africa: Smallholder farmers as drivers. AIMS Agric. Food, 4(2), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2019.2.485
Osanya, J., Adam, R.I., Otieno, D.J., Nyikal, R., Jaleta, M. (2020). An analysis of the respective contributions of husband and wife in farming households in Kenya to decisions regarding the use of income: A multinomial logit approach. Women. Stud. Int. Forum, 83(3), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2020.102419
Pacheco, P. (2009). Smallholder livelihoods, wealth and deforestation in the Eastern Amazon. Human Ecol., 37(1), 27–41. Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20117
Pan, W.K.Y., Bilsborrow, R.E. (2015). The use of a multilevel statistical model to analyze factors influencing land use: A study of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Glob. Planet. Change, 47(2), 232–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.10.014
Pan, Y., Xu, Z., Wu, J. (2013). Spatial differences of the supply of multiple ecosystem services and the environmental and land use factors affecting them. Ecosys. Servic., 5(3), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.002
Pan, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, M. (2024). The impact of entrepreneurship of farmers on agriculture and rural economic growth: Innova-tion-driven perspective. Innovation and Green Development, 3(1), 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100093
Ponette-González, A.G. (2007). 2001: A household analysis of Huastec Maya agriculture and land use at the height of the coffee crisis. Human Ecology, 35(3), 289–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9091-4
Raymond Mhlaba Local Municipality (2021). Final reviewed integrated development plan 2021–2022. Municipalities of South Africa. Retrieved from: http://www.raymondmhlaba.gov.za/system/content/documents/reports/2021/idp_sdbip%20/Draft%20-%20Reviewed%20Intergrated%20Development%20Plan%202021-2022.pdf
Rondhi, M., Pratiwi, P.A., Handini, V.T., Sunartomo, A.F., Budiman, S.A. (2018). Agricultural land conversion, land economic value, and sustainable agriculture: A case study in East Java, Indonesia. Land, 7(4), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040148
Rosenbloom, J. (2018). Fifty shades of gray infrastructure: land use and the failure to create resilient cities. Washington Law Rev., 93(1), 280-317. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol93/iss1/7/
The state of environmental outlook report for South Africa (2016). 2nd South Africa Environment Outlook Executive Summary: A report on the state of the environment. Executive summary. Department of environmental affairs. Pretoria. Retrieved from: https://www.dffe.gov.za/sites/default/files/reports/environmentoutlook_executivesummary.pdf
Thomas, L. (2020). Cross-sectional study, definitions, uses and examples. Retrieved from: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/cross-sectional-study/#:~:text=Revised%20on%20July%2021%2C%202022,observe%20variables%20without%20influencing%20them.
Tiroza, P.C. (2018). Modelling land use and land cover change in the Western Cape Province. [Unpublished doctoral theses, University of Pretoria]. Pretoria, South Africa.
van Rooyen, M.W., van Rooyen, N., Miabangana, E.S., Nsongola, G., Gaugris, C.V., Gaugris, J.Y. (2019). Floristic Composition, Di-versity and Structure of the Rainforest in the Mayoko District, Republic of Congo. Open J. Forest., 9(1), 16–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2019.91002
West, P.W. (2016). Simple random sampling of individual items in the absence of a sampling frame that lists the individuals. New Zeal. J. Forest. Sci., 46(15), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40490-016-0071-1
Wyman, M.S., Stein, T.V. (2010). Modeling social and land-use/land-cover change data to assess drivers of smallholder deforestation in Belize. Appl. Geogr., 30(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.001
Xu, W., Fan, X., Ma, J., Pimm, S.L., Kong, L., Ouyang, Z. (2019). Hidden loss of wetlands in China. Curr. Biol., 29(18), 3065–3071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.053
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, An introductory Analysis (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Zantsi, S., Bester, B. (2019). Farming households’ livelihood strategies in Ndabakazi Villages, Eastern Cape: What are the implications to extension services? South Afr. J. Agric. Extens., 47(4), 120–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2019/v47n4a531
Zhu, L., Yang, C., Zhang, Y., Xue, Y. (2022). Using marginal land resources to solve the shortage of rural entrepreneurial land in Chi-na. Land, 11(7), 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071035
Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Warszawie Poland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal.
